elephant in the room, page-56

kroehny17,

I find nothing wrong with moorookamick's analysis of the company's capital position (shares, dollars, income, EPS) and the conclusions drawn from it. A question you should ask the other posters on this stock is why they appear unable to follow his line of logic. A pie (income) does not get bigger the more you divide it, which seems to be the position of people on this forum.

Moorookamick continually has to resort to quoting definitions from dictionaries and reference material because people seem incapable of understanding the terms and mathematics he frames his arguments around. This may appear condescending, but by the same token, those arguing with him merely appear incapable of logic and mathematics because, in this case, he is right and they are wrong.

I put this down to people turning their brains off the moment they see the reply is from someone they react unfavorably towards, resulting in being unable to read the actual words, and conflating sentences into meaningless gobbledegook.

Intent? I believe his intent here is to continue reiterating his position until people admit he is correct, and that the likelihood for GXY's share price dropping to where it is now is because it was fundamentally overvalued because of that lick of stock overhanging (aka: dilution).