Agree folks. The fundamentals are strong, financially prudent mangers and directors and a small amount of shares. However I'm not so much a fan of the new name, I would much prefer the name "The Tungsten Company" (as per someone from this forum previously suggested). "Carbine Tungsten", to me, unnecessarily symbolises a limited tungsten base. If someone with over a 5% holding, or 100 members, agree, would they put this up for resolution at the next meeting. In saying that, I prefer "Carbine Tungsten" to "Icon".
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- III
- Ann: Annual Report to shareholders
Ann: Annual Report to shareholders , page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)