Also, this $410,000 is made up of debt that was incurred in the first writ which has to be getting close to like 6 months ago now.
I would expect that kind of debt to be paid reasonably quickly but the annual report suggests that it is still outstanding.
Does this mean that Dynasty will have to go back to court again to recover the money, thus incurring more legal costs?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- DMA
- directors resignations explained
directors resignations explained, page-6
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 6 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)