tox/jum comparison, page-4

we'll I've only had a quick look at TOX but at last 3rd Q announcement it has lost $700k to date, it has raised $2mill at 1c (200mill shares) year to date via share issues for cashflow (doubling the total shares on issue) and , has a fully utilised $500k overdraft, has 400mill shares on issue and not in the fastest growth industries (waste management).

JUM has been profitable for a long time time now, has no debt, has a profit 9 months to date, has only issued 60mill shares and that was to buy a cashflow positive business, has only 320mill shares on issuer and that after the TMSbusiness acquisition and is in a very high growth industry.

Nothing against TOX but I can clearly see why they are treated differently.