I'll grant that he mentions that summer snow declined from the 1970s, but isn't it curious that he never shows the reader the entire this:
or this:
The article isn't written with a view to discovering the truth, it's written by someone with a preconceived conclusion who generates graphs that purport to show evidence of that conclusion while deceitfully cutting out the part that might call that conclusion in to doubt.
From a scientific standpoint, it's pure intellectual dishonestly