These are not similar technologies. Perhaps it is different rules for topical applications than for oral, IV or subcutaneous, and perhaps the rules are different for different diseases. However I don't agree with a blanket claim that biologics don't need phase 1/2/3 trials. For example, I know that Pfizer, E. Lilly, AZ etc etc are all spending multi-millions doing phase trials on biologics for rheumatoid arthritis.
If someone who understand the FDA guidelines can clarify this I would be grateful.
I used to have a holding in TIS, that's why I keep an eye on it. I really like the product/technology but earlier this year lost confidence with management over-promising, so I have put my limited resources elsewhere - for now anyway.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- TIS
- success
success, page-34
Featured News
Add TIS (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
ACW
ACTINOGEN MEDICAL LIMITED
Will Souter, CFO
Will Souter
CFO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online