andrew bolt, re aust. response to corby trial, page-161

re:gobling/ why murdoch was guilty /not? Two many inconsistencies. Description of dog wrong, description of gun wrong.
Description of Joanne stumbling cabletied in the dark, hiding- and the dog didnt find her -very suss.
Hey, Murdoch is a suss character & a hard man - those "business" runs from Broome to South Australia & back were obviously dope related - but I think he had sweet FA to do with Lees' abduction.

Remember the Lindy Chaimberlain case? The forensic expert that testified that there was foetal blood spray under the dash of the car - turned out to be insulation spray?
N.T. cops are still in the dark ages as far as technology goes.

Gz.