Howdy All
Interesting having a read of the recent BLK scope released yesterday and drawing some comparisons with MNM.
BLK have a 70% stake in potentially 1 billion tonnes of BC ie. 700 MT
MNM have a 50% stake in potentially 2+ billion tonnes of BC at BM ie. 1000 MT.
Comparing chem analysis:
BLK BC - high ash, high sulphur and a 3:1 strip ratio with a max 7.5m thick seam.
MNM BC - lower ash, high sulphur and a 1.5:1 strip ratio with a 50m thick seam.
More importantly (as mentioned yesterday, the buyer/end user is focussed on the CV):
BLK CV wet = 7.9 MJ/kg v MNM CV wet = avg 8.6 MJ/kg (over the first 4 holes) - a big plus to MNM.
BLK were recently offered $15 million for their 700 MT.
However, MNM have more BC, lower ash, cheaper opex to get the BC out of the ground and a 10% greater CV value.
MNM MC is $13 million with $3 million cash = $10 million + opps, etc.
Doing some numbers on that offer to BLK, I believe MNM is currently valued on approx. 50% of their stake at BM.
Therefore:
- 500 MT of BC at BM.
- 80,000 oz gold JORC at GC
- 1.5 Mill oz silver JORC at GC
- 125,000 oz gold inferred at CT
- 100 - 500 MT potential Mt M black coal
- LV tenements
- phosphate at Barkley
are all freebies as determined by Mr Market!
Of course, the above are my calc's - happy to be corrected - but for mine, MNM to me is way undervalued.
Cheers K
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AUL
- undervalued?
undervalued?
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 28 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add AUL (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
CCO
THE CALMER CO INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Anthony Noble, MD & CEO
Anthony Noble
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online