I think to fully understand the test, one has to have intimate knowledge of how these devices work and what the comparative tests are meant to show...I doubt the whole degradability issue is as simple as it sounds. The ultimate test would be which treats the wound better
I'm no scientist, but I would imagine all random tests have to adopt the same procedure to ensure objectivity. Wouldn't changing one dressing and not the other be a bit like telling patients they are taking the placebo?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- CZD
- open question - vac study
open question - vac study, page-2
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
CC9
Chariot Corporation (ASX:CC9) refines Black Mountain strategy, launching Pilot Mine to seize U.S. lithium opportunity