pattyp, page-23

Patty P

as i posted correctly, Desert's points are predominantly not credible

this is contrary to what you posted, that most of Desert's posts translate as more credible than not

Desert has not demonstrated any knowledge of Corporations Law or the commercial implications of shareholdings

Desert seems basically to be a typical troublemaker with mates who are interested in similar political wranglings & infighting

where as most shareholders on this forum hold shares in RWD with the hope that the right decision is made

if we believed developing a potash on LD was wrong and against the interested of the Martu, we would not hold shares

LD is dependent on the OK of the Martu and we have held shares in RWD with such good faith

all the best