re: new doubts on wtc collapse/grant62 Beetljus
I am not disputing there are those that have used the WTC attack for political gain and some where even very quick to do so. This alone though is not proof of involvement in the tragedy, the Bush goverment where not the first or only to act in this manner to a tragedy and they will not be the last.
AS for not accepting the official line as to what caused the collapse of the WTC that is fair enough but to promote some out there therory of being caused by set explosives only makes a persons non acceptance of the officail line appear to be based more on fantasy than reality.
the WTC collapsed because of having an airplane flown into them, that is the main cause leaving the only areas of debate that have any legitamacy being around was the resulting collapse due to the fire, structual damge caused by the impact, building design or construction faults.
- Forums
- General
- new doubts on wtc collapse
new doubts on wtc collapse, page-166
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
RCE
RECCE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton, MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
James Graham / Dr Alan Dunton
MD & CEO / Non-Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online