new doubts on wtc collapse, page-166

  1. 11,223 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    re: new doubts on wtc collapse/grant62 Beetljus

    I am not disputing there are those that have used the WTC attack for political gain and some where even very quick to do so. This alone though is not proof of involvement in the tragedy, the Bush goverment where not the first or only to act in this manner to a tragedy and they will not be the last.

    AS for not accepting the official line as to what caused the collapse of the WTC that is fair enough but to promote some out there therory of being caused by set explosives only makes a persons non acceptance of the officail line appear to be based more on fantasy than reality.

    the WTC collapsed because of having an airplane flown into them, that is the main cause leaving the only areas of debate that have any legitamacy being around was the resulting collapse due to the fire, structual damge caused by the impact, building design or construction faults.



 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.