My feeling is that the risks of corruption and embezzlement of funds is also particularly high - I'm sure Panax directors would disagree publicly, but I hope they are monitoring the situation and safeguarding our interests diligently.
I wouldn't be overly surprised by cost blow-outs, to be honest.
It seems like we are a lot further from funding the Indonesian developments than I thought.
Having said that, management showed, in my view, significant prowess in overcoming barriers with their Australian projects. I think we have good reason to have faith in this lot - they are among the most successful managers in the geothermal industry in Australia.
In some ways, its a pity the funds were spent in Australia rather than Indonesia. However, I also praise them for taking advantage of grants opportunities during the small window when they could.
All in all Panax remains a company with good management and good assets. If finance was not such a problem then this would ba a fantastic opportunity for all stakeholders.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PAX
- Ann: Moten Power Update
Ann: Moten Power Update , page-52
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAX (ASX) to my watchlist
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
1CG
ONE CLICK GROUP LIMITED
Mark Waller, MD
Mark Waller
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online