Hi Hanrahan, you don't have to prove anything you don't want to. But denying proof exists is not very credible when the proof has been given over and over and over again.
Also, observing that someone is writing nonsense is not a scurrilous attack when they are writing nonsense.
Now that person calling climate scientists frauds like he did, with no foundation and against all reason and evidence is pretty scurrilous in my book.
And him saying 'man-made warming...does not harmonize in any way with existing physical theory' is plain wrong. It's the fact that what is observed is completely consistent with physical theory that solidifies the science.
You might keep waiting for someone to convince you personally that the decades of solid science is sound. But until you are willing to listen and learn you'll never be convinced. (It's pretty obvious that you don't want to be convinced or you'd be wrting about science not constantly complaining about posters who do write about science.)
A truly sceptical person would do the reading for themselves. They wouldn't just say 'I don't have to prove anything' and then keep repeating that all the climate scientists in the world must be wrong and a blogger on a share trading forum is right - all without even saying what you do think is right and what you think is wrong. You generally refuse to explain what you find incredible - or when you did (like above) it's easy to show you the problems you're having.
The decades of evidence from science itself is more than ample proof. Anyone who wants to dispute it can't just say there's no proof, because the proof is there in spades. They can dispute the proof if they have evidence to the contrary - but you won't do that and no-one else in the world has done that either.
The fact that you don't want to accept the proof doesn't make the science any less sound. And it's impossible to help you understand the science if you aren't willing to say what your fundamental difficulty with the science is and avoid questions designed to help work that out.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- ipcc fraud and falsifications
ipcc fraud and falsifications , page-34
This thread is closed.
You may not reply to this discussion at this time.
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)