-
Share
7,861 Posts.
392
10/02/12
11:18
Share
Theres no problem with your logic Sigmadelta.
Q/H would have required/asked for a C.Clause to be in place and AGS agreed.
Thats of no benefit to AGS's share-holders imo
What AGS sought is on the Status update page.
If AGS's M&D C case is strong then Q/H would have negotiated something to appease the requirements sought by AGS.
How strong AGS's Case is will play out in time.
If the M&D C Matter is handled/mediated/settled with a C.Clause in place then it becomes a farce.imo
I went through the last 3 Annual reports. Management need to read what they print, with reference to C.Governance, and follow it.imo
And with reference to outside fees being charged for services rendered by ?????.
I'll watch the progress of the Chile Project with added interest now!.imo
Time is approaching when they have to develope the Company towards and to its true potential!imo
Good Luck All
Sm
-