There are a few scenarios offered as an alternative to the obvious. Its been discussed in much greater details in the other chat site. Simply put, Rio is a miner not an engineering/mining operator so they are more than likely to retain a substantial holdings. CGNPC/Itochu are consumers with no U mining expertise so wants a guaranteed security of supply. A probable scenario in a win-win status quo for a 3 way ownership IMO. The question is will the remaining unencumbered 32% of holders remain a stakeholders?
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $18.65M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.9¢ | 1.0¢ | 0.8¢ | $32.19K | 3.571M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 4871738 | 0.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.9¢ | 617246 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.40pm 17/06/2025 (20 minute delay) ? |
| EXT (ASX) Chart |