LOL the guy calls me naive after posting a tabloid video smartly edited to snare people not willing to, or incapable of investigating for themselves. In a nutshell, its tabloid trash that has taken the "missing" $2.3 trillion way out of context.
Then he posts a link to an article that at least delivers a hint that maybe this $2.3t "missing" isn't actually what it seems, but then the guy writing it goes off in some ridiculous tangent about it must have been additional money outside of the budget, because otherwise how would you justify $2.3trillion going "missing" out of an annual $500Bil budget, after expenses. Of course the article provides nothing factual to back up his claim the money came from outside of the budget system, which makes it obvious to the smarter corner of society that anyone wrapping up opinion as fact shouldn't be taken seriously, let alone referencing the article as proof. It is also evident that the author totally debunked himself. If $2.3trillion covertly came from some where else, why state its gone missing when it was covert money in the first place?? Its not rocket science!
LOL then he finishes it off with pasting a link to a nutter conspiracy website which again debunks itself, but thats only obvious to the people who understand what the "missing" $2.3 trillion really is about.
... and in the true and typical spirit of the conspiracy world Nova runs away from my 2 questions. Provide proof the FBI confiscated 84 cameras from the Pentagon and provide proof the area the plane hit housed the accounting details relating to the $2.3 trillion. Not some nutter video telling you that, but facts proving so.
Also apparently your the man in the know about the $2.3t, so tell me, over what period did that money go "missing"?
You want credibility, address the 3 questions. Spotlight now on you Nova, your on mate!
