I see PRR was a flop on the nasnaq, first night. You cant compare BTA. PRR might be there just to raise funds.
We are hugely different. With BTA its the excitment of proven world leading blockbuster drugs and amazing pipeline potential.
We are also closely linked with the USA due to BARDA. I see the Americians getting just as excited in the science as myself.
We want to be in te NASDAQ primarly because the Australia Market does not support home grown Biotechs and see the potential future.
Why is it that most of the huge technolgy companies in the world today are from the States. EASY. The Yanks saw the dream and put the money behind them.
With me it's all or nothing now. We must be on the NASDAQ.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BTA
- new positive broker coverage
new positive broker coverage, page-3
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
MND
Albemarle lithium downsize burns $200M hole in Monadelphous's pocket as latter's contracts terminated
KAI
Pilbara Minerals buys land off Kairos part of its York gold project for $20M – and a 2% royalty on any PLS gold sales