Ask yourself this : would not the Company boast about its low...

Ask yourself this : would not the Company boast about its low mica content applicable to its JORC resources if mica was comparatively low and for battery grade production? (Chemical grade is battery grade)

So while it’s not stated either wa mica contains ferrous material and all the hard rock lithium companies negotiate micaneous material.

So the burden of proof lies with the company to answer the question by showing full assays:

What is “ferrous materials” mentioned 8 times in the PFS?

What is “ferrous impurities” mentioned 4 times in the PFS?

Among the mentions is any of it micaneous?

The test work would specify exactly what this material is. Then interested readers can understand the process flow sheet much better informed.

The company is being opaque as there is no definition in the PFS regards ferrous impurities/materials.

Also no “ore variability testing” has been done according to PFS released in December 2. Its now March. No update on test work since?

The ore variability testing is crucial considering the mineralogy evident just looking at diagrams showing drill intersections.

Ore variability is the great burden of WA lithium minus less so for Greensbushes.

The devil is in the detail said a Tianqi Australia spokesperson.