I found intersting the post he will only invest in a company with positive social media.
Fair play if that’s your strategy but I don’t think it really represents the nuts and bolts of anything to do with a company you should invest in myself but I’m not the gospel of investing (beyond pump and dumps anyway) that’s not going to work if you are a buy and hold person obviously
Anyway hence why all the social media graphs appeared and a bunch of charts I couldn’t understand. It also makes loads of sense why QBL have engaged him actually quite clever and they are probably the most prominent company using social media as their PR strategy
As I don’t invest in the co I can’t comment if the content matches the story but you can be sure they probably receive those social media graphs that were posted 6 months ago on the reg and react accordingly. As I said quite clever and absolutely nothing wrong with it. EVE was primarily pumped a dumped by some brokers it was clear on twitter so no fingers being pointed by the way however the posts in question do read as a lot of stuff which clearly went nowhere - however it did keep the media side positive and thus the price at the time.
Maybe it’s my old school nature of learning investing where I just scratch my head a bit of the social stuff I did say the same ages ago with the Qbl content back then so no surprises there from me.
ANd as I also said in a post recently currently they and shareholders are better having him than not at present as their content is confusing. But all the social media in the world isn’t gojng to be more important than the actual story at some point.
QBL Price at posting:
3.7¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
