@jimone,Your screenshots of the quarterly results confirm an...

@jimone,

Your screenshots of the quarterly results confirm an average of roughly
1.9 grams per tonne over 15 consecutive months of processing.

Not sure why you have a problem with my 0.3-0.8 g/t estimate? Go figure!

You do realise that shareholders were led to believe the average recovery grades would be much, much higher don't you? We were led to believe at least 9 g/t as a minimum imo!

So an average of 1.9 g/t is shockingly pathetic compared to what shareholders were led to expect

Of course it's a pathetic result after being presented with 300 gram plus /per tonne samples

Do you think there would of been a successful $12M capital raising if potential shareholders were told to expect 1.9 grams per tonne???

You mentioned in a previous post that ogx did what they had to do & talked up the grades & news

But no, you say I am Misleading... LOL

I guess the important thing is that they cover themselves with disclaimers as you said in a previous post hey?!

My estimate of 0.3-0.8 g/t avg has NOT been pulled out of the air!

As I said in my post,

There are many factors at play here, not just dilution

Historic best results & Dilution are only 2 factors out of numerous variables.

Some poster's are demanding facts, but you already know them!
Their historic BEST results are posted below

I think you will find my estimate to be quite respectable

I don't expect anyone to thank me in time because it's very disappointing & for some, these results are disastrous

You know what the sad thing is?

There are still many that are expecting 9+ grams per tonne.

And people wonder why the shareholder group exist

DYOR