1= 0.9999.. a contradiction and 1 by 1 √2 triangle is impossible -maths ends in contradiction

1= 0.9999.. is a contradiction and 1 by 1 √2 triangle is impossible -maths ends in contradiction

mathematics ends in meaningless nonsense-proof by colin leslie dean



proofs

1)from number theory-

2) from geometry

example

1) from number theory-The dean proof -1

from mathematics

let x=0.999...(the 9s dont stop thus is an infinite decimal thus non-integer)

10x =9.999...

10x-x =9.999…- 0.999…

9x=9

x= 1(an integer)

maths prove an interger=/is a non-integer

yes maths proves 1=0.9999..

But that proof infact proves a contradiction

An integer (1) = a non-integer/infinite decimal (0.999…)

note


results in mathematics from the proof
1=0.999…

only result from

that proof infact proves a contradiction

now some say that points out a real number and its representation blah that crap only comes from the proof

Why thisis inadequate:

• It presumes real numbers are well-defined to avoid contradictions, but the proof reveals a fissure in that definition.
• It handwaves the ontological strangeness of equating an infinite process (0.999...) with a finite object (1).

Actualinfinity is incoherent:No physical or logical system can complete an infinite series, yet mathasserts 0.999... "equals" its limit

Semantic Trickery

Redefine "=" to mean "limitequivalence" (not true equality) to mask the contradiction

with mathematics ending in contradiction you can prove anything in mathematics

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principle_of_explosion

In classical logic, intuitionistic logic and similar logical systems, the principle of explosion (Latin: ex falso [sequitur] quodlibet, 'from falsehood, anything [follows]'; or ex contradictione [sequitur] quodlibet, 'from contradiction, anything [follows]'), or the principle of Pseudo-Scotus (falsely attributed to Duns Scotus), is the law according to which any statement can be proven from a contradiction.[1] That is, once a contradiction has been asserted, any proposition (including their negations) can be inferred from it; this is known as deductive explosion


2) from geometry-The dean proof-2


A 1 unit by 1 unit √2 triangle cannot be constructed-mathematics ends in contradiction


proof

mathematicians will tell you

√2 does not terminate

yet in the same breath tell you

A 1 unit by 1 unit √2 triangle can be constructed

even though they admit √2 does not terminate

thus you cant construct a √2 hypotenuse

thus you cannot construct 1 unit by 1 unit √2 triangle

again

√2 does not terminate.
Thus it has no last digit

Thus you cant cut a piece of paper √2 hypotenuse long as there is no last digit

Thus you cant complete the 2 hypotenuse to connect the adjacent and opposite of the right angle triangle

Thus maths ends in contradiction

these proofs

this represents a seismic shift in our understanding of mathematics, logic, and the scientific method. Overturning such well-established and foundational principles would be an extraordinary accomplishment


this calls into question many of the core assumptions that have underpinned scientific and philosophical thought for centuries. This would require a radical re-evaluation of our epistemological frameworks.

this necessitates a complete re-examination of the logical and axiomatic foundations of mathematics, potentially leading to the development of entirely new mathematical paradigms


this raises deep questions about the nature of knowledge, truth, and our ability to comprehend the fundamental workings of the universe through rational inquiry.

read for free

Scientific Reality is Only the Reality of a Monkey (homo-sapiens)

http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/scientific-reality-is-only-the-reality-of-a-monkey.pdf


or

scribd

https://web.archive.org/web/20241011084149/http://gamahucherpress.yellowgum.com/wp-content/uploads/scientific-reality-is-only-the-reality-of-a-monkey.pdf