Wow, these are some unsubstantiated statements.As someone that...

Wow, these are some unsubstantiated statements.

As someone that has actually played both and even if you haven't played both, logically speaking an "absolute copy" would be an open invitation for lawyers to come and introduce themselves.

The game has similarities but they are different. Just like iPhones and Samsung are similar but different. Each have their supporters but they co exist in a huge market.

Magic The Gathering is the original. A turn based card game where you use resources (mana) to play spells and creatures. That is the core of MTG, Hearthstone and Gods Unchained.

Gods Unchained has recruited a top Hearthstone player as a game designer and more recently, the former MTG Game Director to join the team. These are big players from the 2 biggest games. I doubt that they would jump ship for a project that nobody wants to play because it's an absolute copy and the only reason cards are selling is because every single person is seeing it as an investment.

Even if it was an "absolute copy", you are completely dismissing the single most important differentiation of gaming on the blockchain which is true ownership and what AB1 themselves are all about. If you were a Hearthstone player you would understand the pain of spending money on packs to get cards which you can't sell on an open market even though you paid for them. How does that make sense? If I spent $500 on cards and got a super rare card that you wanted to buy off me for $1000, why can't I sell it to you? Blizzard Entertainment's answer is because they want you to also spend $500, maybe even more to try and get the same card.

I understand you are frustrated at the TH for AB1, but your statement above is actually dismissing the very core technology of the company you are investing in.....