It is an issue that when BIT should be aware they cannot make a...

It is an issue that when BIT should be aware they cannot make a stated deadline,
That when asked by shareholders,
Shareholders are threated like fools and told
"there is no further information than what is in the Announcements"

Only to then be let down and have them miss that deadline once again.

Why they chose to communicate in a such a rude and
not honest way to shareholders is an issue.

Why not be straight up and say:
"Oh yeah there has been some delays and it does seem unlikely we will make that deadline"?

Why were they not straight up with everyone who as emailed them about delays,
and be told:
"we messed up with the CRO they cannot process enough data quick enough
to do all Phase II Trial results at once"

As apparently someone was told on the phone.

Why are some shareholders being told one thing,
And other shareholders being told something else?

Why do two different people at BIT,
Tell Shareholders two different things?

Why does MM say nothing has changed from the Announcements?

And PN? supposedly say : "we stuffed up with the CRO?"

Who is telling the truth?

And why are there two different stories anyway?

Why wasn't the CRO error Announced?

Is it true that the CRO error was even mentioned?

Is it true that there was an issue with the CRO?

Why were Shareholders not informed immediately when BIT became aware of this?

When / If BIT became aware of this they would have known that the stated timelines would not be achieved why did they hide this from shareholders?

Surely it would be price sensitive?

Why are deadlines not corrected once BIT is aware they will not be acheived?

Does it even care if it makes correct statements or not?