no, don't agree with anything you wrote there.
Your two points about healthy people being able to 'naturally counter heath concerns', as we've been doing for generations,is terribly lacking in any proper understanding of the role vaccines have played since being introduced, including the present pandemic. They have literay saved the lives of millions of peope, healthy and not.
You can't draw true conclusions based on false premises. All your premises are false.
People like yourself confuse deductive validity for truth. Things may sound fair and logical enough, but that doesn't necessarily resut in the arguments being true. I've pointed this out on these boards previously.
Here is a demonstration regarding the mRNA vaccines.
P1: New technologies may prove not to be safe
P2: mRNA vaccines are new technologies
C: Therefore, mRNA vaccines may prove not to be safe
This argument is in fact deductively valid because the conclusion follows from the premises, and therefore is very appealling to our sense of logic, resulting in yoursef and likeminded folk to avoid mRNA vaccines. A simiiar argument can be created for all vaccines.
But the argument is not necessriy true because there is a lot of information about mRNA vaccines missing form these snapshot premises. The world's medical fraternity are very confident in them, apart from a few lone voices. I'm not referring to the general pubic here. The truth of anything is not dependant on the number of people who believe it to be true. If it did, we'd still be believing in a flat earth. Truth of an event depends on the facts of the event, and not on anyone's beliefs in those facts. I may believe that I had coffee for breakfast, but the truth of that is not dependant on my belief that I had coffee. My belief can be mistaken.
As for mRNA vaccines, they have not been developed in a vaccum of knowlege and pressed upon us to make poiticians jobs easier in a pandemic, or even pharmaceutical companies rich, even if both of these points are achieved.
In short, anti vaccination thinking is very misguided and shallow thinking. Unfortunately though, shallow thinking can't be overcome easily by better thinking by others. Rather, it takes practical demonstration like when sailors circumnavigated the globe going in the same general direction, or presently, when those unvaccinated are now flooding vaccination hubs to get the jab, now that catching C19 is as good as a dead set certainty, thanks to Omicron.
Everything you stated is incorrect, but arguing with fools is even more foolish. Fool me.
Expand
(20min delay)