gbb you didnt answer any question asked. Seems you avoided it...

gbb you didnt answer any question asked. Seems you avoided it all entirely which comes across as unusual..
Trump. REE results. Hazards. Political concerns.,,,,I just thought you may be able to help shareholders understand these facets better as its what you already would clearly know all about.
As I stated a university paper dated 30 years ago isnt enough to prove what REEs you stated are all centrally located. Did you discover this from drilling during the decades of ownership? I hope these results went to EPM because its not been released to market as far as I can see and it really should. Wed need more information to substantiate and if you cant do so I suspect we will find it soon
You could answer me this one too.
0.6% REO upgraded to 2.5 – 2.7% isnt 3% upgrade to 23% is it?
Neither did I say anything about zircon treatment processes. What I did say is there is another company who mines zirconium etc with only a REE waste byproduct. Was I wrong or am I right?
Of course waste byproducts are that way because they are not viable as primary target. The only focused REE mine we have on the table in Greenland has tons of eudialyte on their tenement too as you know . However it only mines steenstrupine instead for its Dy, Nd, Te etc. Which offers profits given extractions obtained at PFS IRR 75% with 10% byproduct. The point being EPM with its own RE profile doesnt compete with either in my eyes. Which has been suggested here as much as silver will compete with a gold miner. As neither offers much Eu or a similar profile to me. This is all logically fair to assume. So they could all work in well together and barely cross paths unless you wanted to call one a REE miner when its actually a low grade byproduct waste thats hard to extract.
However I cant foresee EPMs REEs being a primary product with just Eu in high grades (there appears to be Nd there too maybe). It depends on what the buyer is after. It depends too on the cost of extraction for that basket price based still on extraction grades. Which wont be a lot with one REE will it. But we can surely at least assume carbonite at Ivittuut is also easier to extract then eudialyte and therefore offers some hope there.
Im correct again there right gbb?
All these reports yet none on hand. Sounds much like what you say frequently elsewhere. Ive only ever gotten one from you and it was 40 years old with considerable work showing otherwise since given technological upgrades and hence why Ive asked you for something more current now. Of which you alluded. But again my request appears to be to no avail and neither your input on what I am concerned would be EPMs formidable hazards in opening its mine.
Dont say I didnt ask gbb. I guess you can now only downramp what Ill offer if you cant offer it now upfront.

All I can feel is before EPM pays out tens of millions to these buying entities. They shouldnt do so at feasibility but actually at mine approval. Then they could discover all situational concerns without first losing all that cash and shares. But I will give them credit because Phase 2 and 3 milestone payments will remain shareholder approved so if any hiccups arise that concern shareholders prior. There is still room to avoid. Knowledge is always powerful and I hope they discover it prior enough to comfortably move on in time.

It would just be great for EPM and their shareholders to be aware of all input that could cause complications prior to that time rather than losing so much to discover down the line there were complications they were unaware of.
Maybe Im wrong gbb. Maybe Im right. Its all in my opinion right? As yours isnt forthcoming. Would you mind if I shared mine?

This is all fair too gbb. Im sure you would be ok with me offering it as you have been sounding very tense.