The whole lot of these arguments are amateurish but I like
2. Aristotle, 2350 years ago, demonstrated that to argue from “consensus” is a logical fallacy – the headcount fallacy. Some 95% of all published arguments for alarm about our influence on the climate say we must believe the “consensus”. Why was Aristotle wrong?
3. Aristotle, 2350 years ago, demonstrated that to argue that the “consensus” is a “consensus” of experts is a logical fallacy – the fallacy of appeal to authority. What has changed since 2350 years ago to make argument from appeal to authority acceptable rather than fallacious? _____________________________________ What's the obsession with I get it Aristotle - mention Aristotle a couple of times and we might overlook the shallowness of your arguments and "the fallacy of appeal to authority" haha so why the appleal to Aristotle ??
