If he's right though(and from the article it seems he probably is), that effectively means WE are suing 10ft and paying for it. I think it's disgraceful for a "listed" company to be suing someone for simply sharing their research and opinion of the company. I think their time and our money would be better spent focusing on actually making some money trading and sorting out the corporate governance issues so that these "listed" companies actually trade on the market.
If history is a guide, the share price will fall in a heap, IF it ever trades again. Can anyone give an example of a company or it's directors suing(or threatening to) social media commentators and not ending up on the floor? I can give several that did ... BLA, CDU for example spring to mind.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?