You obviously didn't read what I posted yesterday so here it is...

You obviously didn't read what I posted yesterday so here it is again

"You just don't get it

If what you are suggesting was true, then a drill anywhere in the area 3500 (strike) x800 (width = 2,800,000 sq m or 280 hectares) would find nickel at the rate of 1.25% & the seam would be 180m thick (or as you now suggest, maybe even more)

If it was that easy, why haven't they found it yet?

Answer: They haven't so stop making foolish claims"

Your "pass the calculator" statement is just brutally untrue so please stop pushing it

The area may be 280 hectares but there will be no 180m seam & certainly the nickel will not be spread evenly over the whole 280 hectares (if there is any nickel there at all)

If you are so hot to trot on Spargoville, ring Daws & ask him to drill it - I know what he will say to you - probably 2 words - FO. The result you posted above are from 2018. They have had 3 years to think about them & obviously, at this stage, the BoD have determined that even though the results are not too shabby, they don't warrant further work. CB is more important to them