If nothing else, can ASIC not act purely based on the irresponsibility of management to lend away $5 million and put the company in such a precarious cashflow position?
Especially as there is a track record of them doing this before with Sands and then declaring it "unrecoverable".
If nothing else, can ASIC not act purely based on the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 40 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)