I appreciate the considered post shyaam. To your last point - I agree - and take responsibility for some less than respectful rhetoric - especially considering my "newbie" status compared to the what appears to be some knowledgeable long term contributors here. I should stick to a rule that nothing good comes from posting after 10pm. Apologies to Itsa.
I am not concerned with the CR - although it could have been handled better imo. I am concerned with reinforcing my conviction on what has become a largish position for me in a binary outcome biotech investment.
Appreciate you looking into the PUL 2.0 results like I did. It would be handy to know what the normal six month deterioration in PUL 2.0 results for non-ambulant boys is - just to determine margin of error on efficacy. For instance - if the placebo scores average minus 4.0 on the scale, it would make 0.125 or 0.9 look a lot better than if the normal deterioration is minus 1.0. The fact that the scores are in integers as well, means there is wider margin of error in scores. The lymphocyte reduction data in my mind looked more conclusive, but I understand that is not an endpoint for the P2b trial (?).
The main reason for the point about the PUL 2.0 results, was to see the statistical robustness of the testing parameters and getting a better idea of the probability of success in P2b. The grip and pinch test results seemed to be less convincing - but I'm no expert here and would be glad to be told otherwise.
P2b and P3 trials with promising prior P2a results have been known to fail because of factors such as:
- changing the trial parameters from the prior trial (I understand we are trialing both 25mg and 50mg so either dose being successful, or both, would be a tick).
- having less control over the clinical application in the larger trial
- results not reproducable
The costs of failure are high obviously and reasonably binary in nature.
The Ionis licensing deal terms will be hard to get imo as it is probably going to be kept under wraps.
Yes - there are some very informative/knowledgeable posters here that I have learned a lot from in a short time. I am happy that you are open to critical questioning as it coincides with my ethos of investment - seeking the truth.
cheers, Boom
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- PER
- $15m cap raise Fresh Equities at 24c
$15m cap raise Fresh Equities at 24c, page-538
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 318 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add PER (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
8.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $72.12M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
7.9¢ | 8.0¢ | 7.9¢ | $33.85K | 424.8K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
3 | 76080 | 7.8¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
8.0¢ | 10226 | 1 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
2 | 61080 | 0.078 |
1 | 10000 | 0.077 |
1 | 26000 | 0.076 |
5 | 201800 | 0.075 |
3 | 180866 | 0.074 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.080 | 10226 | 1 |
0.081 | 100000 | 1 |
0.083 | 100000 | 1 |
0.084 | 100250 | 1 |
0.085 | 220000 | 2 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 23/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
PER (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
SER
STRATEGIC ENERGY RESOURCES LIMITED
David DeTata, Managing Director
David DeTata
Managing Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online