If NSW was "locked down" earlier it would not have necessarily...

  1. 10,423 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    If NSW was "locked down" earlier it would not have necessarily made any difference to the number of "cases".

    Just because a city's residences are locked up it may have no bearing on how many infections are discovered at all. If the city's people were not locked up, do we know how many "infections" then there would have been? Nope...no one does.

    This saga is just plain stupid...I'd like to know how many of those people found "infected" are actually sick? Yes a few have died, but they might have died if they were infected with a bad dose of the Flu too.

    Let the people get on and live their lives, if you know you are vulnerable to the bug or scared of it stay home or just don't mix with strangers in crowded places...
    The permanent damage being done to thousands of people's lives is unforgivable. These people will never get the time back that is being stolen from them by these stupid public servants who care not for them but only for their political skin.

    The answer in my opinion is to go get vaccinated anyway, it really won't hurt you. Sure, if the vaccine isn't 100% effective, 50% effective is far better then 0% with nothing...





 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.