I don't agree with the sentence "how's rustys and invest advice working out for us" firstly they arnt on the Avq board so everything they say should be taken with a grain of salt because this is the Internet, and secondly the sp is where it is because of the court case and not anything anyone has said on hear, suggesting otherwise shows you arnt understanding how this whole thing works. So in saying that why attack 2 poster who have given us a decent amount of reliable info?
