I'd expect the service provider to get more than DUB, more than...

I'd expect the service provider to get more than DUB, more than likely this was a deal led by someone else (e.g. a call centre transformation) and DUB was proposed as a solution. Presumably it's a Broadsoft platform, and Broadsoft pointed in DUBs direction. That would explain why DUB is being so cagey, as a subcontractor they would have to run everything by the prime contractor, who are probably just saying not to mention anything until it's signed in ink.

On a side note, if you exclude the communications around the bank deal then the comms around the MOUs has been pretty consistent and overall pretty decent.