No, again, not upset, just pointing out the factual errors in...

No, again, not upset, just pointing out the factual errors in your uneducated post re the reasons why the price dropped yesterday. Be honest for a change and put your hand up, it is really quite refreshing: your argument was full of holes in that particular instance and you looked rather silly. It's okay, we are all human, we can all make mistakes, and you did in this instance. I at no stage - ever - mentioned whether I was happy with management or not, just pointed out you really have either no idea what you are talking about or have an ulterior motive. You got called to account and you don't like it. I mean why else would you bother? Are you really so arrogant as to think that your opinion really matters, that shareholders would be taking any notice of someone so glaringly wrong? I have no objection to other shareholders having contrary views on whether management are good, bad or indifferent; whether they are upset about the size of a dividend or the direction management are taking; that is their right, they have paid the price of admission to have a say, unlike you. If you want to be taken seriously then I would suggest you think before you go flapping away at a keyboard. As for the high school debating team, which I did get a laugh at, I'd only say you'd have to be effin' kidding!