It's a valid discussion point.
NEN had $19m cash at the end of June.
Costs for 120 for NEN are around $5m
Costs for 105 for NEN were around $3m.
Rough quarterly non-Vietnam costs around $3m
So less than $10m in funding, getting tight. Material daily extra costs on 105 over-run.
I am extremely positive on NEN's short term success, but discussion is warranted, unless we are missing something?
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- NEN
- 2 milll sell overhang
2 milll sell overhang, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 36 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)