"Bedger could not understand why this was not a market sensitive...

"Bedger could not understand why this was not a market sensitive announcement. I'd be guessing most others can"

See, you show time and again what an utter snake of man you are. I am nowhere to be seen on these threads of late and you snidely suggest I am in some way ignorant on a well discussed topic without the prioverbials to tag me - as we have seen so many times before, such is your (lack of) character. Bedger knows exactly why it was not flagged as a market sensitive announcement or indeed announced more a formally in notice at all (as usual your commentary around ZIP shows your ignorance therein), rather than the casual fashion in which it was announced (unusal that you did not have your usual pot shot at ZIP's professionality yourself - but that would mean of course agreeing with me). Because I understand and am familiar with both the ASX rules for ZIP in disclosing information and the ASX listing officer's ability to even over-rule price senisitivity flags that a company may omit - again things you have shown yourself ignorant to (at least we are educateding along the way of your foul behaviour on these threads as a silver lining).

You show yourself to be a nefarious, sneaky little man, never missing an opportunity to cowardly and falsely attribute dirt on people in their absence - thanks @TB51 for flagging.

Rather than being offended, I delight that you demonstrate yourself as usual to be a callous little man on ZIP threads all on your own, without any provocation. You really offer nothing to ZIP discussions on Hot Copper, just tedious spite and overwhelming down-ramping of ZIP and its posters.

Unlike yourself, I only make statements on the back of convincing evidence. Lets have a little look at the ZIP share price around the time of the casual announcement of the Google partnership:



Oh look, only a near 30% rally to when news of the oh so casually announced partnership with the, oh I don't know, the sixth largest company in the world? So as usual, you try and throw muck at me when the evidence says, per my suggestions at the time, the announcement was very price sensitive and should have been announced in a far more formal and price sensitive fashion than it was. I picked it up early and posted in on here (as the company should have done via a formal price sensitive release), but not before buying more stock knowing its affects.

The hilarious thing is that you have been all over ZIP management for far less worse errors than this as in them being someway crooked. And no, the trading of ZIP absolutely showed people resoundlingly agreed with me on the subject. Hence they bought the stock in droves, as they should on such an impressive partnership announcement.