Share
4,191 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 5463
clock Created with Sketch. 15/11/21
03:38
Share
Originally posted by Docear1:
↑
I think Jack's point is that they're not a "vaccine" in the usual sense of the word. I think that they are an moderately (but maybe decliningly so) effective prophylactic therapeutic. They certainly don't seem to be very effective at stopping one from getting an infection (the actual definition of "vaccine" in its traditional use). Nor from spreading it, if the Iceland (Ireland?) and Vermont data are anything to go by. The question begs: Why the push to take away ancient and hard gained liberties for something marginally effective? Especially now that there are "officially approved" big Pharma type therapeutics on the near horizon....Why force people to to take the shot when it may be, based on the Israeli data, that the vaccinated become "super spreaders"---or at least some data suggests so. I would be a little more hesitant before embarking on the demonization of many of our fellow citizens on the belief that I had some sort of metaphysical certitude? Why the rush to get everyone the shot? And why in the youngest age groups (children to 25) where there is almost nil chance of mortality from COVID and much more chance of ill effects from the vaccine?
Expand
(20min delay)