'Why cant they indicate what EVERYTHING else in the now completed BFS is minus the water cost or even give a BFS opex+ back of envelope water componant????????'
Because I don't think many would like the answer. This is why I brought up the issue of evaluation of lower production rates. Why would you do this unless you were worried about not being able to break even. They're obviously trying everything possible to find a positive production answer.
I'd conserve money and wait for RP prices to rise.
'Why cant they indicate what EVERYTHING else in the now...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add AEV (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
1.0¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $24.19M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 1.0¢ | 1.1¢ | 1.0¢ | $19.66K | 1.962M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1077633 | 1.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1¢ | 1099040 | 7 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.13pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| AEV (ASX) Chart |