2020 BRN Discussion, page-173

I have read my post and do not think that it in anyway implies that BRN Ai is being used by Socionext. To make clear my intent. I have previously posted that as a result of past performance I always seek independent confirmation of statements made on behalf of BRN.
In this case the CEO in his recent webinar stated that they were having discussions regarding engagements with Socionext after the project to produce AKIDA is complete and moved on to TSMC.
Until I found and read this statement from Socionext I had no evidence that Socionext as a company had a policy of entertaining engagements with third parties such as BRN as referred to by the CEO.
So what I personally can conclude is that discussions between BRN and Socionext of the type stated by the CEO are possible and in line with Socionext’s stated policy.
The fact of these discussions having taken place would form part of the usual business records of both companies so on balance it is unlikely that the CEO knowing this would state such discussions were taking place if they were in fact not
Given Socionext’s knowledge of AKIDA IP if it is what it is then as Socionext has this policy of pursuing opportunities and engagements for Ai at the edge anything is possible.
I hope this is removes any confusion.