2020 BRN Discussion, page-22890

The first thing which distinguishes this from AKIDA is that it is cloud based not unconnected edge.

So subject to state sanctioned cyber attack. Think about how the corruption of such a system so positives were being reported as negatives in a mass screening program to prevent spread.

This cannot occur with AKIDA.

The second is as BarrelSitter had said they are in trials. Remember Peter van der Made presented trial results from testing carried out in China already completed with results capable of peer review and publication which we know from the CEO and Ken Scarince through Jesse is currently being actioned with international partners.

This leaves out any consideration of a failure to advise its accuracy (AKiDA94%) and how in countries without perfect internet availability how it performs when speeds reduce in periods of high traffic or during electrical storms or monsoon and other natural events.

My opinion only DYOR.