And that just shows how shallow human perception is when it...

First 7 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Sabbath

9,647 Posts.

332

01/03/21

19:08

Post #: 51429929
Share

Originally posted by zipperlip ↑

Do you truely think that an academic institution such as the U of Vic would blacklist an internationally recognised researcher for explaining facts, birdman?

The scientific community only seek truths and are not afflicted with the human imperfections that the rest of us face, so I’ve been told.

Our believer friends have been quite adamant that any claims suggesting views contrary to consensus views of the effects of MMCC wouldn’t have an adverse effect on the career of the person.

What has been suggested in the article would be the polar opposite and suggest that any scientists that disagree or offer a point of view that isn’t instep with the consensus claims of negative impacts related to MMCC are risking their careers.

It seems things haven’t changed since Darwin’s days, he didn’t want to publish the Theory of Evolution book until after his death because of the backlash from his peers as he knew that they would be very critical due to what was considered the scientific consensus of the day.

Expand

And that just shows how shallow human perception is when it comes to validated contrarian views.

Since being at school over 60 years ago I held science in the highest regard, however my opinion of the current scientific community border on them being comedians in a very poorly constructed stage production.

I'm really disappointed to have to take this view after science being one of my stronger job prospects, I'm glad I chose an alternative course of employment as being in the scientific field now would lead me to total apathy and despair.
3 Upvote

Reply