Thanks to everyone else who replied as well.
The point is both articles are opinions which can be held however the statement in one that Brainchip is a play in the space race where obviously the technology would need to work and the statement about concerns about the technology in the second based upon anonymous shareholders is not either fair comment or supported by their own recommendation and can only be seen as malicious and defamatory.
Clear cut simple as that and even that lawyer from the Castle would win this argument.
My opinion only DYOR
FF
AKIDA BALLISTA
2021 BRN Discussion, page-22280
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 11,301 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
29.0¢ |
Change
0.035(13.7%) |
Mkt cap ! $572.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 26.0¢ | 29.0¢ | 26.0¢ | $10.11M | 36.62M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 22403 | 28.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 29.0¢ | 628072 | 21 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 08/11/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| BRN (ASX) Chart |