So it has nothing to do with it being a SNN and more to do with the datatype used... This doesn't contradict my point? These are all parallelised processes, so it will take the same amount of time to propagate a whole image through a layer of CNN vs propagating one event through an SNN. Maybe there is a tiny difference due to datatype but I doubt it is significant and am I correct in saying you are just speculating? Or do you know that it contributes a significant delay?
In any case, doesn't change that the fact that it is more the number of layers in the network rather than the type of network. Yes a CNN will use more power, will it be slower? I haven't heard a compelling reason why. This was the main point behind Simon Thorpes argument that the NNs of today are bloated. The time it takes for a human to recognise an image is too fast for it involve several "layers" of neurons.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- BRN
- 2021 BRN Discussion
2021 BRN Discussion, page-31919
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,662 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add BRN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
16.5¢ |
Change
-0.005(2.94%) |
Mkt cap ! $323.8M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
17.5¢ | 17.5¢ | 16.0¢ | $1.039M | 6.226M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
53 | 2389988 | 16.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
16.5¢ | 94290 | 7 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
51 | 2282926 | 0.160 |
63 | 2366657 | 0.155 |
129 | 3429092 | 0.150 |
31 | 620931 | 0.145 |
36 | 636656 | 0.140 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.165 | 94290 | 7 |
0.170 | 679592 | 15 |
0.175 | 732429 | 19 |
0.180 | 1104473 | 21 |
0.185 | 849361 | 15 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 17/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
BRN (ASX) Chart |