2021 BRN Discussion, page-5986

From memory, his book is littered with grammatical inconsistencies.
Was surprised they passed editing but find this to be the case (to a greater or lesser degree) in many books I have read.
In works of fiction I find this to be very irritating as it, to a pedantic like myself, has the effect of breaking the spell.
However, in works of non fiction such as "Higher Intelligence" it is a mere annoyance and can be forgiven whist one grapples to understand the intent and mechanics being explained.
Where even such an apparently simple concept as "red" will have different contextual and shaded interpretations according to an individuals cognitive history, reading meaning into an uncontextualated fragment of sentence is liable to be fraught with error.
I think Tech has provided as much clarity as we are going to get at this point in time.

Wishing like others for some positive news, but content and understand that it all takes time and is not running according to my particular schedule.
GLTAH