You only need to compare the AoA-ann with FYI's pronouncements....

You only need to compare the AoA-ann with FYI's pronouncements.
For example, AoA talks about pro rata cost sharing (65%), whereas FYI claims that the 8,000t factory is financed by AoA almost alone.

https://alcoa.q4cdn.com/375357455/files/doc_news/2021/09/20210930_HPA_FYI-VF.pdf

FYI:
>>Phase 3
Upon entering phase three, Alcoa would contribute the first US$68m of FYI's funding requirement in relation to Phase 3 construction costs by sole funding the first US$194m of costs associated with the construction of the full-scale facility.<<

In my opinion, AoA is unambiguous, while FYI expresses itself ambiguouslyDo I see this wrong ?