"they are saying they have used for the super trivial purpose...

"they are saying they have used for the super trivial purpose "Hey Mercedes" and not any other real feature of say self driving. Because it can not be used with self driving feature."


https://hotcopper.com.au/posts/59217366/single

"What a shame - that paper published 3 year ago and not a single car in the universe is driven using neuromorphic chip nor any company mentioned they will be thinking to use nuromprphic chip for doing critical work apart from some trivial detection of ‘hey Mercedes’ in speech."

---

Hi @shareman, Earlier it was stated many times by @thesunny123 that neuromorphic chips like Akida can't be used for self driving or A@thesunny123

but this is in total conflict with the words of Gil Pratt from Toyota all the way back in 2016


as you can read the text from the relevant article:

https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/04/07/161135/toyota-joins-the-race-for-self-driving-cars-with-an-invisible-copilot/

Toyota Joins the Race for Self-Driving Cars with an Invisible Copilot

Pratt also suggested that Toyota will take a different computational approach. During his speech, he noted that existing self-driving cars use computers that consume thousands of watts. To achieve greater power efficiency, Pratt said Toyota could use neuromorphic chips, an architecture that computes data in parallel rather than sequentially, as conventional computers do."


---

Can we expect you to now start policing the fake information coming from thesunny123 ? Because I understand this to cause a great level if misinformation against new and existing shareholders? Do you agree that thesunny123 is wrong and do you think he is being deceitful?