I would be carefull commenting like that if I were you, you are...

I would be carefull commenting like that if I were you, you are basically rubbishing the single largest database of patient results that exists on the planet earth..... and trying to convince everyone that a significantly smaller sized trial, with tiny numbers in comparison is somehow going to be more accurate results which is complete and utter horse crap. It is the biggest lie that I have ever read.

If the data base is 100 times the size, that makes the results' 100 times more accurate, particularly when you consieder there are still no approved treatment. If anything else worked, according to all the downrampers here.... it should have been approved yesterday.

The database has already proven statistically it is more accurate at predicting survival than the FDA's own classification of the disease...... what does that say ?

So lets get past that point of the notion that the results are altered from some unicorn unproven drug in every recipient of MSB therapy ..... it's quite frankly utterly and even stupidly ridiculous, and without a single shred of evidence of any kind at all, whatsoever. Absolutely unequivically non factual, and if you disagree.... please "show us the money" ! If you have any evidence.... a shred.... an atom..... show us !