2023 - the year for ICG, page-578

Hi Allens,
So from the Quartely there is a mention of a hole 11 to be drilled at FFE following up hole 8.


So in an attempt to isolate the peaks of the MT data isosurface spikes i created the below which adds a depth slice (Z slice) that cuts off only the peaks of each spike.

using this i then rotated the image to be directly overhead as per below.

this overhead view allows us to then compare with the below magnetic and gravity images from previous announcement.

below is the crudely superimpose the MT data isosurfaces on top of the gravity and magnetic images.

in answer to the question, the mag and gravity targets at hole 11 don't line up with the crude MT data but maybe it doesn't need to. These are modelled peaks born out of interpreted data taken from deeper sources. So, as hypothetical fluids tracked to surface there may have been many altered pathway through structural weaknesses before it approached a location closer to surface. Also, without all the data modelled together and interpreted correctly it's hard to say why they don't line up exactly. Although from other known resources it is common for Gravity, magnetics and IP to be offset somewhat.... probably not by Km's though.
For what it's worth and probably only my opinion i still think the government hole 4 could of had a follow up hole as i don't think it reached the target.