Yes, it was a vote against director remunerations sparked by...

Yes, it was a vote against director remunerations sparked by nervous shareholders with a lack of understanding and appreciation for the hard work and long hours that it has taken management to develop the necessary complex ecosystem and strong network of partners that BrainChip now has. You only have to go on to the BrainChip website to see how much work has been done by the company, it’s impressive. Most long term shareholders now have a better understanding of the AI sector and can appreciate the work that has been done by the BrainChip team. They have a reasonable expectations of when Akida will hit the market and how long it will be before we see significant revenue flow in. Shareholders will vote accordingly. Long term shareholders with medium to large holdings would have kept up with their research and will make rational choices. For good reasons, there is a lot of confidence shared between many of the long term shareholders.