2024 BrainChip Discussion, page-1482

Hi All
Rightly or not, the way I like to think about all of the Partners that Brainchip has, is that Brainchip is spending shareholder money and time to develop products with our partners.
This kind of arrangement with sooo many partners could be extremely lucrative for shareholders, but not without the extreme shareholder costs that we've experience under NDA blackout for the past 3years , the share price decline due to such slow company making traction, more and more dilution to LDA in lieu of cap raising/SPP and no invoicing of customer engineering assistance.
All I know is invoicing of our engineers time with customers stopped when more and more Partners being aired on twitter became the new normal.
Therefore by arrangement we must be Part Owners in all these Partnered Products. IMO
But how would anyone really know what we've got, while we're told bugger all.

Has Brainchip become a product speculator with all cost and risk being borne by shareholders who are not aware when or how this flip in direction came about to move away from being a pure IP licenser like the ARM model we were all told about???